Sentence examples for methods was about from inspiring English sources

Vilkman et al. conducted a test-retest analysis of 11C-FLB 457 PET scanning with 7 healthy volunteers (mean age ± SD = 29.0±6.9) and suggested that coefficient of variation (COV) of each extrastriatal region in BPND_Logan and BPND_SRTM methods was about 20% and the reproducibility of both methods was good [51].

By comparison with the field observations, it was found that the error of the retrieval methods was about 1.0 °C and the methods were applicable for LST retrieval in the cities in the hot-humid region.

When we compared histograms of RMS of residuals for all 2417 station pairs separated by less than 10 km (Fig. 8), the mean RMS from the frequency-dependent correction methods was about 27%% smaller than that from the scalar correction method.

Doctors think these methods are about equally effective, but they have not been compared side by side.

The two first methods are about equally efficient, whereas the latter method is seen to be quite inaccurate.

The matching experiment is also performed on images with the same resolution and the total detected features in two images for the three methods are about 5400.

The feature detection experiment is performed on images from INRIA database with the same resolution, and the detected features for the three methods are about 2400.

The detection limits of the two methods were about 10 copies of recombinant plasmid containing AbSV genes in 20 μL reaction mixture.

The temporal variations of the height-integrated Hall conductivity derived from the two methods again correspond well where the correlation coefficient between values from the two methods is about 0.86.

Those women who are using long acting methods are about half as likely to have experienced a pregnancy or birth between baseline and midterm as non-users and women using spacing or traditional methods.

For prevalences of 0.3 and 0.5, the log-binomial method appears to be less biased for estimating the slope, while for a prevalence of 0.7, the two methods were about equally biased.