Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
Case in point: On Monday, DeCode Genetics published an important genetic map assembled by methods very different from those used to create the sequence of the human genome that will make it much easier for scientists to hunt down new genes linked to disease.
Both groups used methods very different from those used in the work described here.
Similar(10)
A new method called M-matrix method, very different to the linear matrix inequality (LMI) method, has been proposed to solve the above problem.
Different methods gave very different topologies and large differences in likelihood, and yet few of the differences were well-supported by the bootstrap.
The two methods identified very different gene sets that differed between the groups.
However, the assumptions and proof methods are very different from the assumptions and proof methods in Theorem 3.1.
As a consequence of these different methodological approaches, the empirical results obtained comparing these two methods are very different, with lower values using the frictional costs method [ 34].
The result in England wasn't – same companies, same methods, but very different results.
In the end, the polls were right in Scotland, but not in England: the same companies, and the same methods, produced very different results.
His methods were very different from the "extreme measures" that we've been hearing about — waterboarding, sleep deprivation, humiliation — and that are being justified on the grounds that they're the only way to get this kind of information.
Accuracy and mechanism of these methods are very different.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com