Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
A significant limitation of this work is that the economic evaluation methods varied significantly between interventions thus impacting on the comparisons made.
The AA values obtained with the four methods varied significantly (P < 0.05) within the same extraction mediums, revealing a ranking order as follows: ORAC > HORAC > DRSC > FRAP.
Changes in the total nitrogen of the different composting methods varied significantly (P ≤ 0.01) with the different sampling period, while the variation among the composting methods was found to be statistically insignificant (P > 0.05) (Fig. 5).
Similar(57)
These methods vary significantly in goal, scope, structure and the exact way of considering safety aspects.
Our results show that the effectiveness of these stochastic methods varies significantly between the different tested problems and also depends on the stopping criterion especially for SA, GA and PSO.
Although developed for the same goal of assessing human health or environmental impact, these methods vary significantly in the number of effects considered and the way of processing data.
The methods currently used for evaluating creatinine clearance have been compared in a study investigating the sera of different animal species; these methods vary significantly in their measurement of creatinine clearance in serum and overestimate or underestimate the actual glomerular filtration rate, which is represented by the clearance [ 6].
Furthermore, reports on the sensitivity of the method varied significantly.
Table 1 shows that the spatial scale of assessment and exposure assessment method varied significantly across studies, probably contributing to differences in effect estimates.
It is seen that the reward performance of the overhead method varies significantly with the moving speed.
Although the results of initial studies showed that the MET had exhibited high sensitivity and specificity compared with PAP-AUC method, [ 6, 20, 24, 25] the accuracy of this method varies significantly between different studies [ 3, 7, 11, 23, 24, 28].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com