Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
We saw a broad range of approaches, from generalised boosted methods to random forests, single value decomposition to matrix factorisation and collaborative filtering, with no one class of model outperforming all the others.
Over a 10-day period, we compared PDF file acquisition based on AL methods to random selection based on the performance of the detection model.
Similar(58)
Very good correspondence is found between F.E. results and microscopic cross-sections, showing the usefulness and applicability of the method to random lay-ups and optical fiber dimensions.
The method, which is illustrated with some examples, represents a dramatic reduction in the number of focal element evaluations performed when applying the Monte Carlo method to random set theory.
Then we apply the method to random graphs and lattice embedded random regular graphs, and derive the expressions of their characteristic curves.
Our use of whole genome sequence data allowed for targeted identification of phylogenetically informative markers (i.e., SNPs) to distinguish between B. pseudomallei and B. mallei, a preferred method to random identification of SNPs in conserved genes, as was done previously [20].
This algorithm determines "consensus" clusters by measuring the stability of clustering results from the application of a given clustering method to random subsets of the data.
Additionally, we also compared these methods to Random Forest, but implementation details restricted the analyses that could be performed on this technique.
We present methods to diagnose random effect model misspecification of the type that leads to biased inference on joint models.
We used a simple algorithm (see Materials and Methods) to create random space-filling partitions of the gray matter voxels consisting of N contiguous regions.
This pattern can be demonstrated by applying phylogenetic methods to sequence, random amplified polymorphic DNA, or restriction fragment length polymorphism data, or by using serum cross-reactivity studies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com