Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
With currently used non-standard methods, the risk of false positives can be considerable.
Whereas no increased risk for deep venous thormbosis, myocardial infarction and thrombotic stroke was found for the progestogen-only methods, the risk were two-sixfold elevated in CHC users.
As with all ideal testing methods, the risk to the patient in patch testing is generally quite low [ 5].
Moreover, if central tolerance is complemented with peripheral tolerance (as described in Methods) the risk can be greatly minimized.
The results are presented in Figure 3, where we show, for each of the three methods, the risk of the parameter estimation as a function of budget used.
However, for Alternative Medicine practices, Biologic-based therapies, and Manipulative and Body-based methods, the risk versus benefit calculation is less straightforward.
Similar(51)
Finally based on the designed method the risk values are calculated and low cost candidate solutions are selected.
With this method, the risk of the SMA being overheated can be reduced, yet providing sufficient power for the useful gripping task.
With the ellipsoid method, the risk was higher.
With the ellipsoid method, the risk was higher (Table 2).> -wrap-foot> Thellipsoidid and the sum-of-cylinders methods were compared (different SDVOLUME).
By this method the risk factors are compared in the overall context according to their relevance expressed by their hazard ratio.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com