Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
METHODS:The review updates the foundational systematic review conducted by Agarwal et al. in 2015.
Methods: The review process followed guidelines consisting of 5 steps suggested for systematic reviews.
The few papers on business ethics using the Delphi method lead us to compare it with other widely used methods; the review of the Web of Science papers explained previously, and conducted in June 2016 by authors, shows it is the most widely used survey in business ethics (393 papers, 44.91%), followed by case study (283 times, 32.34%) and interview (123 times).
Similar(57)
However, despite a rigorously designed method, the review still had some weaknesses and limitations.
Following allocation of documents or sub-sections by method, the review included 33 quantitative studies, 46 qualitative studies, and four economic studies.
The authors describe the methods of the review process clearly.
NJG contributed to the early design concepts, and methods for the review.
The inclusion criteria and methods for the review were pre-specified in a protocol (available on request from authors).
Instead data were extracted from all studies on key methodological issues (see 'Methods of the review' below).
Materials and Methods The institutional review board approved the study.
13 14 Table 2 compares the analytical methods of the reviewed risk scores.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com