Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Except the Seed and JRA methods, the evaluated LPIs by other methods predict only light to moderate liquefaction-induced damages which are not consistent to the severe GF3 damage condition observed in the field.
Similar(59)
The results show that the proposed method performs best among the evaluated methods.
In Supplementary Note 4 we give an overview of past evaluation studies, the methods they evaluated, and the evaluation aspects where we believe these studies are lacking.
The three methods evaluated were the conventional method, wrist pivot method, and extraoral method.
The method precision evaluated the ability of the method to analyze multiple dilutions of sample.
The two methods were evaluated using the correlation coefficient and the Bland and Altman method [ 7].
The two methods were evaluated using the correlation coefficient and the Bland and Altman method.
The Table 2 shows all the methods evaluated.
The performances of the method were evaluated on the synthetic patterns obtained by SSRs characterization of the mixed pools used in the previous section (Supplementary Table S1).
The applicability of the method was evaluated by the determination of FA in pharmaceutical formulations.
The accuracy of the method was evaluated by the analysis of certified reference material.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com