Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
With the use of standard correction methods, the error was largely removed.
For the parametric methods, the error threshold was fixed at 5 × 10−8, and for all of the methods, the window of analysis slides was 0.04 s.
When the data is missing in segments (Fig. 2b), for all methods the error is in the same magnitude of the signal.
For the parametric methods, the error threshold was fixed equal to 10−7, and the window of analysis slides was 0.02 s for all of the methods.
For the three tested methods the error surfaces are rather flat and only slightly increase for log ks/cm s-1) between -1.5 and 0 (Figure 8).
For the parametric methods, the error threshold was fixed equal to 10−5, and for all of the methods, the window of analysis slides of 0.04 s was used.
Similar(51)
For the proposed method, the error assessment relying on the residual error function is presented [24].
With the SY correction method, the error terms do not sum up to zero by construction.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the estimation method, the error rate is introduced as the evaluation indicator.
If the Standard Deviation of Depth Change (SDDC) method is considered as the most accurate method, the error incurred by the proposed method is less than 7%.
Compared with numerical simulation method, the error of these two cases are not more than 2%, which proved that this method is reliable.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com