Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Even with as little as 10% of known interactions, semi-supervised methods still outperform unsupervised methods for multifactorial data.
Similar(58)
AWF SR after individual-frame compression using the optimum global SNR, while perhaps inferior to the other methods, still outperforms bicubic interpolation by a significant margin both subjectively and quantitatively.
On multifactorial data, the supervised and semi-supervised methods achieved the highest accuracies; even with as few as 10% of known interactions, the semi-supervised methods still outperformed all unsupervised approaches.
Q(U) method still outperforms the PF(P), which gives same conclusion as in the previous case without coordination.
Figure 7 shows that ferries method still outperforms geographical based method when the number of gateways are decreased from 12 to 8 (34%).
It should be emphasized that the new method still outperforms the typical one in case of presence of noise with uniform distribution.
This concludes that the ferries based method still outperforms the geographical based method when the number of gateways in ferries method is less than geographical based method by 34%.
Even when both proteins in a pair have NEFF values >6, which indicates both proteins have sufficient homologous information, our method still outperforms HHpred slightly.
Nonetheless, at α = ∞ using branch lengths as hard constraints as Pinney et al. do), our method still outperforms the probabilistic method on the Teleost network (F1 score of 0.84 vs 0.77).
Our method still outperforms the others, though not as significantly, with sSn and nPC values of 0.565 and 0.414 for LP/DEE; 0.550 and 0.402 for Gibbs; 0.501 and 0.358 for MEME; 0.560 and 0.407 for Projection.
However, with large sector vertex angle, enlarging the coverage of sensor network via increasing R, reverse topology still outperform the conventional method, which is the only way to optimize the network in this scenario.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com