Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(14)
The developed methods showed high reproducibility and repeatability (RSD < 5%).
The methods showed high specificity, only showing a little cross-reaction towards CAP succinate.
Both assay methods showed high specificity and acceptable reliability for real serum samples analysis.
Culturing and molecular methods showed high populations of undesirable microorganisms, arguing for a required improvement in the hygiene of Casín manufacture.
Both methods showed high sensitivity to CAP in buffer, and obtained an IC50 value of 0.05 ng mL−1 for Method I and 0.4 ng mL−1 for Method II.
However, all the tested methods showed high values for the correlation coefficient, with an excellent performance-to cost ratio in molecules with similar structures.
Similar(46)
Each of the ten top-performing methods showed higher accuracy (higher Fmax) on single-domain proteins.
All methods showed higher accumulation of measured reporters in C6/LacZ cells compared to enzyme deficient parental C6 cells.
Furthermore, CG-MD simulation in agreement with experimental methods showed higher thermostability of mutated SXA which proved applicability of this simulation for thermostability analysis.
Machine-learning methods showed higher averaged accuracy in the simulated data set than Bayesian regression, although with a large standard deviation across replicates.
In the mouse data set, the Affymetrix methods without background correction showed similar magnitude of fold changes to all techniques applied to Illumina data, except vsn, whereas the other Affymetrix methods showed higher fold changes (see Additional file 12).
More suggestions(15)
measures showed high
processes showed high
approach showed high
methods showed highest
methods showed excellent
methods showed favorable
methods showed contrasting
methods showed similar
methods showed low
methods showed good
methods showed different
methods showed consistent
methods showed promising
methods showed potential
methods showed comparable
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com