Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(22)
All methods showed good accuracy and reproducibility, with only small differences between methods.
The two methods showed good classification according to their species in HCA.
In normally consolidated (NC) soils, the K0 values predicted from these methods showed good agreement.
The numerical optimal solutions for the test problems using these methods showed good agreement with the analytic solutions.
The proposed methods showed good sensitivity, limits of quantification were lower than MRLs and precision (expressed as relative standard deviation) ranged from 2.9 to 11.1%.
The N2O fluxes measured by the different methods showed good agreement in magnitude and temporal dynamics, especially when the automatic chambers were in the eddy covariance mast footprint.
Similar(38)
The results produced by both methods show good agreement, Bayen said.
In general it is found that all the three methods show good agreement.
The collector thermal parameters, FRe and FRUL obtained by the two test methods show good agreement.
Both the measurement methods show good repeatability but that of the point method is slightly better.
The numerical results of the buckling coefficients based on both methods show good agreement.
More suggestions(15)
methods showed better
approach showed good
methods showed excellent
methods showed favorable
methods showed contrasting
methods showed similar
methods showed low
methods showed strong
methods achieved good
methods yielded good
methods showed different
methods showed consistent
methods showed promising
methods showed potential
methods showed comparable
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com