Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(14)
In general it is found that all the three methods show good agreement.
The collector thermal parameters, FRe and FRUL obtained by the two test methods show good agreement.
Both the measurement methods show good repeatability but that of the point method is slightly better.
The numerical results of the buckling coefficients based on both methods show good agreement.
Within the fluid (gauge) pressure range of 0 0.981 MPa examined, the stiffnesses obtained by deflection- and natural frequency-based methods show good agreement.
The two different methods show good agreement (r2 = 0.99), with an average difference of 8% between measurements made at the same times likely caused by spatial variability (Fig. 4).
Similar(46)
These three methods showed good repeatability of measurements.
All methods showed good accuracy and reproducibility, with only small differences between methods.
The two methods showed good classification according to their species in HCA.
In normally consolidated (NC) soils, the K0 values predicted from these methods showed good agreement.
Most methods showed good performance as measured maximum diameters derived from these methods corresponded well with pathological measurements [11].
More suggestions(15)
approach show good
methods displaying good
methods show improved
methods show potential
methods show significant
methods show high
methods show various
methods are good
methods achieve good
methods show comparable
methods show particular
methods show equal
methods have good
methods indicate good
methods show excellent
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com