Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Different methods show different scales and also different variation trend.
Catalysts prepared by different methods show different dynamic behavior.
In contrast to method1, other methods show different behaviors around fundamental frequency.
As it can be seen, the three methods show different Pareto charts.
For optimization, the MOPSO method shows the best performance in terms of exergy and thermal efficiency; however, in terms of the costs, the three methods show different performance in different fluids.
So it can be concluded that the obtained samples using different synthesis methods show different luminescence properties, which can be related to the guest host interactions between the guest molecule and the silica matrix.
Similar(53)
In regard to the VAS and TTO methods, in which respondents are required not only to compare but also to express strength of preference, these two methods showed different values between healthy people and patients, though these differences were moderate for the VAS and large for the TTO.
However, hot solution and ball milling methods showed different behaviors.
In terms of confidence interval coverage, the DS and DO methods showed different patterns across the range of detection probabilities.
The 2 mapping methods showed different results.
Specifically, the different levels of physical activity (measured by objective measurement methods) showed different relationships to overweight.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com