Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
All our local transfer learning methods show comparable performance with KMM method in all situations.
When the proportion of idiosyncratic responders is low (e.g., 5%), both 7-fold and double cross-validation methods show comparable results for the standard OPLSDA approach (Supporting Information Table S-4).
Similar(58)
Although both the RF and SVM methods showed comparable performance, RF achieved a better accuracy (0.81) compared with SVM (0.75) and slightly better AUC50 (0.327 for RF and 0.32 for SVM).
Both methods showed comparable and reliable results with regard to detection of benzimidazole resistance.
A comparison of the nitrification rates calculated from both analysis methods shows comparable results (Table 3); confirming the accuracy of the chemical data.
The performance of the proposed method was compared to traditional shake flask extraction method on the spiked real soil sample and extraction methods showed comparable efficiencies.
We found that the three methods showed comparable accuracy when the proportion of masked SNPs was low.
We found that the three methods showed comparable accuracy when the proportion of masked single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was low.
The PCI and the modified SF methods showed comparable DNA yields for all three samples with a general trend towards a slightly better performance of the modified SF method (with the exception of the bone sample of Ind.1; Table 2).
Collectively, both methods showed comparable levels of tumor vascularity in WT and EC JAM-C-KO mice, suggesting that the delay on tumor growth in the EC JAM-C-KO mice was not due to reduced angiogenesis in these mice.
The analysis of signal intensity values for the four Bacillus subtilis control transcripts that were added to all LCM-derived RNA samples before amplification (see Materials and Methods) showed comparable amplification in all the LCM-derived RNA samples and the ovine fetal ovary (r average: 0.92).
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com