Sentence examples for methods reviewed in from inspiring English sources

Overall, the methods reviewed in this paper highlight the diversity of queries, breadth of questions and complexity of redesigns that are amenable to mathematical optimization strategies.

Except for temporal impairments, most of the methods reviewed in this section have been proposed and tested for images and not for videos.

Compared with the existing sparse-based [7 10] methods (reviewed in Section 2.2), the main contributions of the proposed method can be summarized as follows.

The idea behind the methods reviewed in this section is to describe a service in terms of its response time, assuming the lack of any further information concerning its internal characteristics (e.g., contention level from concurrent requests).

If different training and testing datasets were used, this is indicated by two numbers separated by '/.' Although a direct comparison is not feasible due to the different data per study, it can be seen that our method performs better than all (16) reviewed methods in Table 2, whereas it has the highest sensitivity and the 4th (out of 14) lowest selectivity among the methods reviewed in Table 3.

In addition, since the function of a protein usually depends on the identity and location of a small number of residues, local structural comparison methods (reviewed in [1]) represent the ideal tool to focus the comparative analysis on the residues which are critical to function.

It is noted that the distributed sources within each sub-microgrid still can share the real or reactive power proportionally since they are controlled by the established droop control method reviewed in Section 3 and 4, respectively.

The IgE adjuvant capacity of the CNF particles was initially investigated in a footpad injection model suitable for studying respiratory allergy adjuvants (method reviewed in [ 13], performed as described in [ 2]).

However, accurately identifying circulating miRNA disease biomarkers is highly dependent on pre-analytical variables such as sample type and collection, processing, storage, and RNA isolation method (reviewed in [ 6]).

Study tools and methods are reviewed in-house, which increases internal utility, but may reduce external validity.

The methods reviewed above comprise techniques presented in literature in the last decade.