Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
Many of the methods require expensive equipment.
Gas-phase methods require expensive and large-scale vacuum equipments.
All of these methods require expensive instruments and sample cleanup procedure.
These methods require expensive instruments, time-consuming sample pre-treatment and skilled persons to operate them.
Generally, these methods require expensive and sophisticated equipment, high temperatures with long processing times, expensive precursors and high consumption of electric energy.
However, these patterning methods require expensive mask, complex multi-step processes, and metal catalysts in some cases, and deposition of seed layer on substrates.
Similar(48)
Since, some of these methods required expensive equipment(s) and/or special treatment.
Generally, these methods requires expensive instruments, qualified personnel, sample pretreatment and are hard to use in environmental conditions.
Meanwhile, this method requires expensive heavy ion accelerometer and restricts the fabrication and application of the solid-state nanopore severely.
However, this method requires expensive DNA sequencer and needs to further analyze after obtaining the raw sequences data, which restrict the use of this method more or less.
This is in contrast with other fabrication techniques, such as reactive ion etching and vapor liquid solid methods, which require expensive equipment and may produce nanowires with surface defects, uncontrolled crystallographic orientations, and limited cross-sectional shapes [11].
More suggestions(15)
methods require toxic
methods require further
methods require manual
methods require smooth
methods require specific
methods require complex
methods require sophisticated
methods require different
methods require rigorous
methods require considerable
methods need expensive
methods require front-end
methods require complicated
methods involve expensive
methods use expensive
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com