Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Another study investigated DEXA and QUS in horses and found that the two methods provided different information; QUS measured not only BMD but also the microstructure and composition of the bone [ 26].
The three methods provided different and, ultimately, complementary information upon this variation: SAVA showed that variation in men was slightly lower than that observed in women, but not negligible in either case, according to the EB statistic (table 1).
Similar(58)
Thus, different identification methods provide different system representations.
Evaluation results show that these methods provide different properties concerning achieved performance and resource awareness.
The numerical study on the test problems indicate that in most cases, the methods provide different solutions.
In addition, it can be observed from the literature that different MADM methods provide different solutions (order of preferences) for the same problem.
However, it is argued in this paper that no one definition will suffice and that all three methods provide different, yet important, insights into natural landscape character.
Precision and implied accuracy appeared substantially better with the visual detection line-transect than with the fixed-width transect for equivalent costs and effort at all three landscapes but as the two methods provide different estimates there are questions of possible bias in both approaches.
These methods provide different degrees of taxonomic as well as quantitative information on the microbiota [ 5].
Although these measurements provide similar results in some articles (15, 21, 22), it is possible that these three methods provide different results in calcified arteries.
Therefore, both type of methods provide different informations about the duration of a transcription cycle with ChIP, qPCR, and 3C suggesting 30 to 60 min (Degenhardt et al. 2009; Metivier et al. 2003) and FRAP and live-cell imaging indicating far less (reviewed in Hager et al. 2004; Phair et al. 2004).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com