Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(14)
Both methods produce very high-resolution surface 3D point clouds and allow surface measurement from the computed profile.
We assume that these three methods produce very close estimates of the fractal dimension of the whole mosaic of patches as shown in Convertino et al. (2012).
However, it is interesting to observe that the Pearson and Spearman methods produce very similar results and neither method is consistently more accurate or more conservative than the other in terms of probabilities of failure.
The numbers of identical sequence groups with a sequence from one (22,556 groups), two (2,058), three (521), or all four (101) prediction methods confirms the observation that the gene prediction methods produce very different results, with many unique sequences for each prediction method.
When restricted to the risk from birth to age 64 (i.e., under 65), the different methods produce very similar results.
Figure 8 shows that both methods produce very similar skeletons (SD=0.84 voxels, SSD=3.55 voxels, SSD%=7.6%).
Similar(46)
In the end, the polls were right in Scotland, but not in England: the same companies, and the same methods, produced very different results.
Both methods produced very similar results.
In all cases, the three methods produced very similar topologies.
All three methods produced very good correlation of internal replicates, but the highest average correlation and the narrowest spread of values was obtained with our direct random method.
Comparison of data imputed manually and that imputed using Maskov revealed that the two methods produced very similar datasets (data not shown).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com