Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
The other five methods produce approximately the same statistics as the 10% MCAR missing data pattern.
Similar(59)
The prediction method produces approximately 10% false positive results when set to yield 10% false negatives.
When comparing the three segmentation methods, FS and OM tend to produce approximately equivalent results for SPECT images acquired at 24 h p.i., while Fourier surfaces perform better for images acquired at 336 h p.i.
The traditional molar ratio between HAuCl4 and sodium citrate to produce approximately 20 nm-sized GNPs with the conventional citrate reduction (CR) method is almost 1 3.5 as stated in [12, 24], and many research groups have successfully reproduced approximately 20 nm-sized GNPs with the conventional CR method at almost 1 3.5 ratio [12, 24, 27].
Digested slaughter-facility wastes can produce approximately 60 percent methane.
o The mixed company expects to produce approximately 240,000 b/d of extra heavy crude (8.5B0 API).
Bone marrow precursors produce approximately 50 billion neutrophils per day.
The solvothermal method initially produced approximately 25-nm-sized nanoparticles which, afterwards, aggregated to the 3-D porous ZnO.
When measurement noise based on a current imaging system specification is added, the two methods produce images that are similar with crosstalk both at approximately 2 × 10 − 3 (Fig. 9(d)) showing little difference between non-spectral and spectral reconstruction techniques.
The percentage of missing cells in the default imputation method was approximately 48 49%, whereas the imputation method using 50 flanking markers (SH) produced approximately 24 25% of missing cells, and the imputation method using 100 flanking markers (LH) had approximately 32 33% of the total number of missing cells replaced by their expected values before performing the prediction.
Both methods produce sound of equal quality.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com