Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(11)
Still other doctors are devising their own methods of weaning women from the drugs -- suggesting they wear estrogen patches and gradually trim them down to nothing, or increase the interval between pills.
Two well-designed, randomized, multicenter studies [ 1, 2] have compared the above methods of weaning.
Several methods of weaning further reduce the WOB and are termed spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs).
The purpose of this study is to compare two methods of weaning from mechanical ventilation, using a prospective, randomised and controlled protocol.
This multicenter study evaluated four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation: intermittent mandatory ventilation, pressure support ventilation, intermittent spontaneous breathing trials throughout the day, and single spontaneous breathing trials.
To compare two methods of weaning from mechanical ventilation - once-daily trial of spontaneous ventilation (ODT) and pressure support ventilation (PSV) - analyzing (1) total duration of mechanical ventilation, (2) duration of weaning and (3) frequency of successful weaning.
Similar(49)
Studies have arguably shown it to be the most successful treatment for the problem and an astonishingly effective method of weaning insomniacs from sleeping pills — even those who have taken them every night for decades.
It is known that SIMV is the most ineffective method of weaning those patients.
The method of weaning in the trial comparator arms (protocol or non-protocolized usual care) did not influence the effect of automated systems on the duration of weaning.
Identifying when the patient is ready to wean and deciding on the most appropriate method of weaning is influenced by the judgment and experience of the doctor.
The method of weaning to which automated systems was compared (protocolized or non-protocolized usual care) did not influence the effect on weaning duration.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com