Sentence examples for methods of justification from inspiring English sources

One line of response to this predicament is to explore options for non-deductive methods of justification in mathematics.

Third, proponents of public reason point out that when methods of justification require participants to refrain from appealing to the whole truth, this does not entail the conclusions reached will not be true, or that the method is somehow indifferent with regard to the truth of the conclusions reached (Mendus 2002, 26 28; Rawls 1996, 150).

The effect of both institutions and reflection about internal disagreements about doctrine is that reasonable comprehensive world views can find room, from within their own perspectives, for a wide reflective equilibrium that includes the elements of public reason (the political reflective equilibrium) and a willingness to engage in public methods of justification for them.

The theory holds that criminals are able to neutralise values that would otherwise prohibit them from carrying out certain acts by using one or up to five methods of justification: "denial of responsibility", "denial of injury", "denial of the victim", "condemnation of the condemners" and "appealing to higher loyalties".

The theory holds that criminals are able to neutralize values that would otherwise prohibit them from carrying out certain acts by using one or up to five methods of justification: "denial of responsibility," "denial of injury," "denial of the victim," "condemnation of the condemners," and "appealing to higher loyalties".

He used a method of justification that he associated with Socrates, Aristotle and Sidgwick.

Finally, what is the relationship between the original position and Rawls's non-foundationalist method of justification, "reflective equilibrium"?

Rawls self-consciously applies the concept of reflective equilibrium in explaining the method of justification underlying his theory of social justice (Rawls 1971).

By the mid-20th century these attempts at defining the method of justification and the context distinction itself came under pressure.

From this method of justification, we might conjecture that Aristotle believes that the important similarities are those that enter into such general causal principles.

Some philosophers defend a restricted form of constructivism as an objectivist method of justification for certain normative judgments typically, moral judgments without taking an explicit position about the nature of all normative truths (§6).