Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(1)
This was indeed the case, with evaluation P values ≤ 1E-5 (Hypergeometest tesee see Materials and Methods) observed for 11 19 of 36 different regulatory systems in each species (fig. 4 b and supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material online), and with 13 data sets exhibiting significant P values in at least three non- Drosophila genomes.
Similar(59)
In the second study phase, individuals who remain HIV negative will be regrouped according to the reported use of prevention methods and observed for 18 months: only traditional methods; combined methods; and PrEP.
A good correlation between both measures methods was observed for PTP and WOB (R = 0,91 and 0,87; respectively).
An excellent agreement between the two methods is observed for DTM with four terms of the Taylor series.
On average a difference of 1.8 log units between both methods was observed for the predicted log Kaw values.
Large differences between methods are observed, for instance the RF model in terms of MCC is performing around the average, but both RF and RF_PCM underperform in terms of early enrichment (BEDROC 0.54 ± 0.03 and 0.56 ± 0.04 vs. the mean 0.66 ± 0.03).
The largest difference between WAD and the other methods was observed for Dataset 1 (MAS).
No significant difference between the two methods was observed for several less hydrophobic OPFRs such as TCEP, TCIPP, and TDCIPP.
A better performance of MATILDE over other methods was observed for all sample sizes considered, as shown in the Additional files 6, 7, 8, and 9.
A result which might strike as paradoxical is the rejection of all the possible topologies by LS methods, rarely observed for short sequences, but unavoidable for very long sequences, both real and simulated (our unpublished observations).
Statistically significant differences between survey methods were observed for the Conduct subscale, with higher problem ratings via phone, while for Peer problems and Prosocial less problems and more Prosocial behaviour were reported via phone.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com