Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(2)
In contrast to traditional shallow classifiers, deep learning methods need less domain-specific feature engineering.
As the amount of the WF-JDGSVD and WG-JDGSVD methods is not much larger than that of the F-JDGSVD and G-JDGSVD methods, and as the weighted methods need less iterations to convergence, the parallel version of the weighted methods seems very interesting.
Similar(58)
The proposed method needs less storage space that causes less accumulation of numerical errors.
This method needs less storage space that causes less accumulation of numerical errors.
The other is that this modified method needs less transducers, a simpler experimental apparatus and easier operation.
The slope of L-curve method needs less calculation than the S-curve method does, but the T2 inversion results from these two methods are close.
From the numerical result, we can see that this method needs less iteration number to converge to the solution rapidly than the additive Schwarz method and SSN.
In addition, the design of nonlinear filter makes the optical flow equation simpler, and the optimal velocity mapping factor method needs less iteration and reduces the computational load.
As the Cyclone 18 twin cyclotron has a newly designed small volume target, the double-shoot production method needs less carrier F2 gas, which increases the specific activity of [18F]F2 in comparison to the single-shoot method using an MC17 Scanditronix cyclotron.
Computational complexity and numerical results demonstrate that, for our new methods, we need less work than corresponding two-step ABS algorithms and Huang's method.
More importantly, numerical results clearly show that the newly developed method does need less number of particles and so less computational costs to achieve the similar level of accuracy, or to produce more accurate results with the same number of particles compared with the traditional SPH and existing ISPH when it is applied to modelling water waves.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com