Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
The final performance category we evaluate is the CA estimation quality achievable by sparse recovery methods measured by the mean squared error (MSE).
A statistical analysis was applied to determine which IM angle of the 4 methods measured by hand was most consistent with the computer-generated IM angle.
Table 10 Similarity between solutions of CGT methods, measured by correlation Coalition Symmetric example Asymmetric example Shapley value τ value Maxmin core ECSM Shapley value τ value Maxmin core ECSM Shapley value – 0.9797 0.9848 – – 0.8559 0.7977 0.7846 τ value – – 0.9443 – – – 0.7384 0.9895 Maxmin core – – – – – – – 0.6443.
The average relative performance of the proposed FRBF Network approach and other FR methods, measured by SSE values and CPU time, is shown in Table 7. Table 7 shows relative performance of the existing Fuzzy Regression methods and Fuzzy Radial Basis Function Network approach for Test Example from Diamond [16] and Ming et al. [31].
Moreover, for log 10 (σ θ anc ) and log10, the differences between methods measured by RMISE and absolute error were small compared to the error bars (± MAD / n ), implying that too much weight should not be given to the respective rankings in Figures 3 and 4. It is worth recalling some of the characteristics of the methods compared here.
Similar(55)
The weight changes of concrete samples were determined by gravimetric method measured by analytical balance within 0.00001 g.
Figure 3 Surface roughness for various dielectric materials and fabrication methods, as measured by ellipsometry.
The running time and CPU time of these methods are measured by LSF.
The association between the two methods was measured by the product moment correlation coefficient.
GR, the most dynamic gene family studied, also exhibited the highest protein evolution rates (GT-ST Rec methods), as measured by ω (Sánchez-Gracia et al. 2009).
The performance of the ITC and MTC methods was measured by the type I error, statistical power, observed bias and mean squared error (MSE).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com