Sentence examples for methods is displayed from inspiring English sources

The order of application for the described methods is displayed in the diagram in Fig.  2.

The basic idea of the proposed approach and how it differs from unsupervised methods is displayed in Figure 1. Figure 1A shows that the proposed normalization approach utilizes all that is known about the study (biology, study design and technology) in order to perform the normalization.

With respect to the residual forces, the difference between the two methods is displayed in Fig. 10(b), with an average force difference lying below 1 N and an absolute maximum of 4 N highlighted in the case of the C-shaped vessel.

The cumulative distribution functions of the multicast rate achieved by above three methods are displayed in Figure8.

Raman spectra of the films produced by the N2-reactive and the co-sputtering methods are displayed with empty and full symbols, respectively.

XRD curves of thin films produced by the N2-reactive and the co-sputtering methods are displayed in black and gray, respectively.

Comparison results between the three methods are displayed in Table 1 for global results.

Further details on allocation concealment methods are displayed in table 3.

Two liquid chromatograms that compare the peptide quality resulting from both methods are displayed in Figure  2.

Additional results based on the alternative approaches described in the methods are displayed in the Supplemental Online Material (Supplement Tables S6 S12).

These values were 56%, 99%, 95% and 93% for reader 2. The diagnostic predictive values for the three reading methods are displayed in Table  2.