Exact(4)
The difference between two methods is calculated according to the equation: Difference = equation depth − layer cake depth.
The increased correlation between 2SHA and OAKFLEX as well as between 2SHA and OAK can be explained by a common subset of descriptors and the fact that the similarity between two atoms in all three methods is calculated by a RBF.
The signal-to-background ratio is estimated as with standard deviation estimated via uncertainty propagation as The signal-to-signal ratio for the two methods is calculated analogously.
If, for example, we assume that true N e = 25, the overall combined estimate across methods is calculated as For N e = 50 and 100, the corresponding estimates are = 36.0 and 38.4, respectively (Table A2).
Similar(56)
The capacity values using various methods are calculated.
The coefficient of variation for both methods was calculated.
Thresholds for all three methods are calculated with the hill climbing method.
The MI values of the four different methods are calculated and shown in Figure 6.
Most of the reported porosity measurement methods are calculated or analogical.
The correlation between the two methods was calculated using the Pearson correlation coefficient.
The ML methods were calculated using the open-source toolkit scikit-learn [11].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com