Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
The combination of methods is believed to establish more effective and more robust results from FTA processes [47, 103, 109].
Hence, the methods is believed to be sufficiently generic to be applied to various real-life situations.
The difference between the values obtained from the two methods is believed to be due to the presence of macroscopic order in the amorphous phase, which influences the value of the WAXS crystallinity.
The structural alignments provided by flexible methods is believed to be better as they are biologically more meaningful [35].
Similar(56)
These methods are believed to be associated with reduced blood insulin and increased circulating free fatty acid (FFA) levels; however, no study has determined which of these methods is the most appropriate.
Evolutionary algorithms (EAs), as population-based search methods, are believed to be well suited for solving MOPs in that they can achieve a set of non-dominated solutions in one run.
The factory's outdated construction materials and methods are believed to have contributed to the severity of the blaze.
The electron-based fragmentation methods are believed to be extremely selective with respect to peptide bonds [ 34], and consequently, the ECD should not influence the modifications of peptides.
Probabilistic methods are believed to be the most effective (Mittelman et al., 2003; von Ohsen et al., 2003) and are applied in state-of-the-art aligners such as prof_sim (Yona and Levitt, 2002), COMPASS and HHsearch.
Given that both methods are believed to be generally reproducible [ 29- 31], the larger-than-expected differences between the LongSAGE and MPSS libraries generated from the same RNA sample is suggestive of a systematic bias intrinsic to one or other of the methods.
This method is believed to work because the short power nap helps clear the brain of the sleep-inducing compound adenosine.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com