Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
"You can tell a good story in five minutes with traditional methods – here, I just got an experience".
Similar(58)
For example, any other methods or new methods only need to be compared with the best performing methods
Inventories of 137Cs observed at the same site implied that more recent erosion rates (over the past 60 years) was below the detection limits of the sampling method applied here (i.e. < 70 t/km2/y).
Therefore, these results strongly indicate that the method applied here, i.e., random PCR-based genome profiling, could provide the sufficient amount of genomic information from a single cell.
Note that we do not attempt to infer self-regulation in either method presented here, i.e. We assume that the time evolution of the is governed by the following ODE (1) Where is the first order degradation rate [estimated from literature (Hambraeus et al., 2003; Selinger et al., 2003)], β is a set of parameters to be estimated and P i is the set of potential regulators for x i.
As the objective here was not to reevaluate all existing dating methods against the ones presented here, I focused on the "best" method identified by [33], namely, penalized likelihood (PL).
Here, I discuss methods historically used to examine those features, and their relevance to the reconstruction of diets in diplodocoid sauropods.
Here I describe the methods for predicting a membrane protein structure from sequence, discuss the approaches to configure membrane protein simulations and detail the techniques used to identify and characterize specific lipid binding sites to membrane protein structures.
These results are similar to findings on reverse correlation and related methods in the neurophysiology literature, but here I formulate them in terms that are tailored to signal detection analyses of visual tasks, in order to make them more accessible and useful to visual psychophysicists.
Here, I used similar methods.
Here, I use two methods to estimate the anthropogenic CO2 storage and uptake for a typically large EEZ (Australia).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com