Some "recovery" methods have involved intimidation.
Until now the traditional online teaching methods have involved simple flash-card-like exercises and animations aimed at getting you acquainted with a language or, at the very least, CDs running you through the traditional "I would like to buy some hashish" and "My hovercraft is full of eels" rigmarole we know all too well from learning languages on tape.
Previous EP methods have involved painful penetrating electrodes that go into the muscle to facilitate delivery.
Perhaps the most commonly applied degradative methods have involved the use of pyrolysis, which thermally fragments the macromolecular material in an inert (or, more recently, hydrogen-contributing) atmosphere.
For example, the development of investigation methods has involved the development of molecular techniques in soil microbiology.
The most commonly used method has involved crossing two parents with different desirable characteristics in an effort to produce offspring that express the best of both of them.
Traditionally, the Delphi method has involved a number of iterations before consensus is achieved.
For example, one method has involved the central presentation of a cue (e.g., threat or neutral word; or fearful or neutral face) and, after a short delay (e.g., 600 ms), a target probe (e.g., asterisk or letter) appears beside the central cue and participants respond as quickly as possible to the probe (Fox et al., 2001, Experiment 5; Georgiou et al., 2005).
In the past, the development and comparison of feature selection methods for QSAR have involved the use of a standard dataset first reported in 1990, the Selwood dataset [36] of the activity of 31 antifilarial antimycin analogues, whose structures are represented by 53 calculated physicochemical descriptors.
Conventional methods of neuropeptide characterization have involved their purification directly from neural-associated tissues in conjunction with the analysis of corresponding gene expression.
The methods to promote physical activity have involved activity feedback using pedometers, activity counseling, and exercise prescription [4] [6], or more extensive lifestyle programs such as those implemented in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS) [7] and the Diabetes Prevention Program DPPP) [8].
