However, uniform high-order accuracy of various shock-fitting methods has not been systematically established.
However, thorough experimentation to evaluate these notations and methods has not been carried out.
However, information on menstrual changes from these methods has not been summarized and compared in an easy-to-understand form.
Despite this growing popularity, the validity of these selection and development methods has not been examined in Belgium.
A numerical scheme that simultaneously allows for sliding boundaries and utilises such high-order shock capturing methods has not yet been demonstrated.
The concept has already been implemented to solve field problems using Finite Element (FEM) and Boundary Element Methods (BEM) but coupling of both methods has not been applied.
Although some review papers on each spinning method have been published, a review comparing these two methods has not been reported yet.
The role of important aspects, including didactic surgical training, surgical decision-making, workshops, conferences, and assessment methods, has not been duly studied.
A common field evaluation of these methods has not been performed until now – raising the question of how well these individual methods perform when applied under different depositional and hydrogeological conditions.
The accuracy of these new methods has not been compared empirically.
To our knowledge, the combination of these two methods has not been reported so far, and this work should be interesting to researchers in polymer academy and industry.
