Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
It said both methods had a role.
Mr. Taylor said his methods had a clear objective.
Dr. Naso said research had shown those methods had a 5 to 25percentt success rate.
But his methods had a high cost: he disobeyed superiors, conducted his own trial-and-error studies, and foisted unproven drugs on sick, vulnerable children.
All methods had a high rate of detection (75 100%), not affected by pregnancy.
Data analysis methods had a pronounced impact on assay sensitivity and specificity calculations.
They found all three methods had a good degree of repeatability, and 3D measurements compared well with manual measurements.
The volume residuals from MLR and ANN methods had a pure nugget effect, i.e. no spatial dependence structure.
The Chemicon and Argene PCR methods had a sensitivity of 93% and 88% and specificity of 90% and 97%, respectively.
Therefore, the change of methods had a negligible impact on the accuracy of the data, as has been discussed in detail by Yan et al [21].
We noticed that the three methods had a similar number of wins considering test accuracy, with a small advantage to J48.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com