Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
FCM and IM gave a maximum percent error of 34 and 30, respectively for average air velocity, U. On horizontal average basis both methods gave fairly comparable accuracies with maximum errors of 16.6% for FCM and 13.7% for IM but on local basis both horizontally and vertically within the tree height the present approach gave a better accuracy.
Similar(59)
The LASSO method gave fairly poor results.
Law & Kaldor's method gave fairly small biases in some scenarios, although the direction of these was difficult to predict.
The results indicates that both the Kissinger and Ozawa's methods for calculating the activation energy value gave fairly close results of 71.6 and 74.7 kJ/mol, respectively.
However, most partitions gave fairly unresolved trees when analyzed individually (see Additional file 3).
The urea method gave a fairly uniform distribution of the nickel precursor throughout the support bodies.
Both methods gave comparable results.
Both methods gave equivalent results.
Both methods gave identical results.
Both methods gave essentially the same results.
These two methods gave similar noise estimates.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com