The reader should note that each selection method from Table 2 provides sufficient information to solve Equation 16 since M≥2N, but they may lead to slightly different results for the same design specifications.
A possible modification to improve the goodness of classification might be to take the results of the CT method from Table 18 and to merge the SR and INT investors, representing the group of investors being generally reachable for SR investing (REACH) due to being already active or at least interested in this topic.
The single well method from table 1 of the same paper is also available by calling deltaDeltaCt function with the argument "paired = TRUE".
Statistically, the performance of D1 method is slightly better than that of D2 method (from Table 1, the Mean ± SDs are 0.3542 ± 0.2866 and 0.2362 ± 0.3560 for D1 and D2 methods, resp).
It can be clearly seen that a strong linear relation between the monthly mean Weibull scale parameters c (averages of the four methods, taken from Table 6) and the measured monthly mean wind speeds for four selected locations.
Figure 19 The contrast SA of extracted VOP after using two different shadow elimination methods for "Table" from frame 1 to 15. Figure 20 The contrast SA of extracted VOP after using two different shadow elimination methods for "Silent" from frame 1 to 15.
Again, the proposed descriptors achieve a great increase of the retrieval performance compared to the performances of the original methods they emerged from (Table 10: re-implemented).
Furthermore, employing the random sampling strategies yield results that are directly comparable and often outperform some of the much more sophisticated and complex methods from recent literature (Table 10: reported in literature).
By using min-max fuzzy satisfying method, it is found from Table 4 (The bold values is the Pareto optimal solution that the best compromise solution is Solution 13, with the maximum weakest membership function of 0.6.
The behaviors of the error bound of integral method and series method, as can be seen from Table 3, are totally different.
