Sentence examples for methods for residues from inspiring English sources

The detection capability levels were 50%% of MRL for all compounds in accordance to the guidelines for the validation of screening methods for residues of veterinary medicines (Table 4) (Community Reference Laboratories 2010).

According to new EU guidelines for the validation of a screening method (CRL document of 20/1/2010 Guidelines for the validation of screening methods for residues of veterinary medicines initial validation and transfer 1), a cut-off level has to be established for each analyte/matrix combination.

This paper provides an overview of the developments in the field of microbial screening methods for antibiotic residues in slaughter animals since the early 1990s, when the establishment of MRLs at levels below the sensitivity of the established and generally applied methods made us reconsider these existing screening methods.

In our previous study, we proposed a prediction method for protein residue-residue contacts [ 5].

In this section, we report results of large-scale experiments on manually curated enzymes from the CSA (Porter et al., 2004) and CATRES (Bartlett et al., 2002) datasets, and compare D iscern with the best methods for catalytic residue prediction reported in the literature.

The earliest methods for catalytic residue prediction relied on detecting conservation patterns across a family (Casari et al., 1995; Landau et al., 2005; Lichtarge et al., 1996) followed by increasingly powerful sequence-based scoring functions (Aloy et al., 2001; Mayrose et al., 2004; Mihalek et al., 2004; Sankararaman and Sjölander, 2008).

Many machine learning based methods were optimized for residues missing from PDB structures [28], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [68].

This not only validates the genetic screen as a method for identifying residues that modulate catalytic activity, but also reconfirms the significance of these residues in drug resistance and cancer.

This criterion is called the "identification capability" and is the same as the CCβ value in the well known EU document 2002/657/EC that defines and describes method validation for residue analysis in food [ 39].

Oxidative labeling is the most straightforward labeling method for aromatic residues, in particular Tyr and Trp, and provides access to purely instrumental labeling methods, such as electrochemical oxidation, which has no equivalent in conventional, chemical labeling methods.

We present six new methods for detecting coevolving residues.