Sentence examples for methods exhibit similar from inspiring English sources

We found these methods exhibit similar relative performance to each other on all the three datasets tested in this section Sphere, Caesar and Buddha.

SSE and LOSA soot concentration values typically agree to within 30% and both methods exhibit similar trends in the spatial distribution of soot concentration.

The three most effective methods improve precision and F-measure for low threshold t values (i.e., t < 0.7) without decreasing recall compared to the baseline method 1 (i.e., using only the link-based classifier) whereas the remaining methods exhibit similar results with method 1.

The two methods exhibit similar error rates with varying network sizes and network evolution rates.

While, nearly all methods exhibited similar performance on sequences with low substitution rates, MP and UMP outperformed the other methods in terms of both lower topological and overall tree error in nearly every case.

Both methods exhibited similar results excluding a possible redox interference of compound 7b with the MTT assay.

Exosomes prepared by both methods exhibited similar morphologies and sizes, although ExoquickTM exosomes tended to form long strings of vesicles, likely as a result of the polymer reagent.

Comparison of the data obtained by an aGp array, Agilent's microarray, qPCR and nCounter™ indicated that these methods exhibited similar expression profiles with regard to target genes with high signal intensities (Figs  5– 7).

Investigating the first set of experiments results in concluding that both methods (i.e., methods 1 and 2) exhibit similar precision-related performance, with method 1 having slightly higher values than method 2 for lower threshold t values (i.e., t < 0.7) and vice versa.

(d) Imaging of internal organs from P. riparius Assignment of organs in a histological section of an insect is difficult, as even with staining methods different tissues exhibit similar colors and are therefore hardly discernible.

Examining the second group of experiments reveals the slightly better performance in terms of precision and recall for methods 3, 4, and 5 (they all exhibit similar performance) compared to the remaining methods (i.e., methods 6, 7, and 8).