Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Obviously, noise interference also was a problem for the SWMPM, which produced less accurate results than the SWMEM; however, it performed well in detecting the spectral components, with errors of the same order of magnitude as the basic parametric methods (error of less than 0.021% for the estimation of frequency and less than 0.9% for the estimation of the amplitude).
Similar(59)
The method error of measurements was calculated using Dahlberg's formula [15]: Method error = √ ∑ d 2 / 2 n.
The method error of this scanner is very small, i.e., 0.05 mm (95% CI 0.03 to 0.07).
These investigators reported a method error of 2.5° and 2.3° on the sagittal and frontal planes, respectively [18].
With the aim of quantifying the full method error of the recordings for each cephalometric parameter, the method of moments variance estimator was used [26, 27].
The CV was determined using the method error of the measurement.
However, urinary CrCl had an unacceptably low repeatability, with a within-method error of 55%.
In this study, the repeatability for Cr-EDTA clearance was high, with a within-method error of only 7.2%.
It is therefore not surprising that the agreement between the Cr-EDTA clearance and urinary CrCl was very low, with an unacceptably high between-method error of 103%.
In an attempt to clarify the criteria for acceptable agreement between two methods, Critchley and Critchley suggested that acceptance of a new method should relay on a between-method error of up to 30% [ 21].
To determine the method error of the cephalometrical measurements, we used the Dahlberg's formula: mean square error S E = Σ d/2 n (d = difference between repeated measurements; n = number of recorded radiographs) [ 20].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com