Exact(4)
MacKinnon et al. [ 16] examined the calculation of mediated effects in cross-sectional binary data with non-SEM techniques using two different methods (difference of coefficients and product of coefficients).
It is not entirely clear, however, what the source of these differences are (e.g., different evolutionary histories among genes being differentially resolved between methods, difference in how methods extracted signal from the multilocus data, etc).
Ordinary and partial differential equations Operator theory Variational methods Difference equations Functional analysis Fractional equations Critical point theory.
We used the latter set of methods over the entire study area, in contrast to the use of similar methods (difference in K-functions) in specific regions to investigate other swine diseases [ 20].
Similar(56)
There is good agreement between the sVOI and tVOI methods (differences less than 10%%).
In both observation methods, differences between the camera optics cause photometric inconsistency.
With relatively simple methods, differences in the intensity of cytotoxicity have been demonstrated.
For the remaining methods, differences are indeed largely non-significant except for the bias.
In all methods, differences in evaluation were seen between the normal and the bulging IVD.
Among these methods, differences center around open versus arthroscopic techniques, location of tenodesis and method of fixation.
Effects of sample differences cannot be ruled out, such as gender differences, age differences, differences in selection methods, differences in education and differences in experience and compensation strategies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com