Sentence examples for methods differed significantly from inspiring English sources

The cited authors showed that the values calculated using data obtained by different methods differed significantly; clinical interpretation and consequent therapeutic decision-making could be adversely affected.

Using paired analysis, each estimation methods differed significantly from measured FiO2 (p < 0.0001 for each).

*Akaike values obtained by the two methods differed significantly (two-tailed tests, Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, p ≤ 0.0042).

The statistical analysis confirmed that the estimates of binding potentials of [N-methyl-11C]mirtazapine provided by the six methods differed significantly (χ2 = 64.4, df = 5, p < 0.001), and it is evident from the table that the values obtained by the two-tissue compartment model differed markedly from those provided by the other methods.

The nonparametric statistical comparison (z-scores) in the table denotes the degree of difference between the binding potential values provided by the methods; *the binding potentials obtained by the two methods differed significantly (two-tailed tests, Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, p ≤ 0.0016).

The two methods differed significantly (two-tailed p-value from paired t-Test ∼0.02, post-hoc power ∼0.30).

Both methods differ significantly in their mean values (mean difference = 11.6).

However, for smaller coverage, the images obtained using these methods differ significantly.

Similar methods have been proposed in the literature, but the equations they are based on and the details of the methods differ significantly.

The methods differ significantly in the aspects and parameters included in the assessment, which consequently influencing the way data is processed.

In general it can be concluded that NB and RF methods differ significantly from other methods and DNN_MC differs from most (based on the methods median value and whether samples come from the same random distribution).