Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Comparison of the flux sampling method to the best local and global topology methods considers only the enzymes present in the reduced model.
Similar(59)
All these methods consider only the fixed channel condition.
Unlike full time-domain simulation, the reduced methods consider only the active power-frequency dynamics to reduce computation burden.
Traditional static analysis methods consider only specific situations; they fail to adequately explain the mutual interactions between the operator and the reactor plant characteristics.
However, the methods consider only two variables at a time, which could be a big disadvantage for the complex system with more than two variables.
Purely local upscaling methods consider only those fine-scale grids that are combined in the target coarse-scale grid (Durlofsky 1991; King and Mansfield 1999).
By contrast local methods consider only a localised part of the image when approximating the disparity and minimise E(D) only implicitly (by minimising E(D) locally to obtain the best disparity Dbest).
However, the vast majority of these methods consider only specific classes of pharmaceuticals [38, 39] or compounds with similar polarities and/or use numerous extraction methods that are time-consuming and labor-intensive.
While most previous methods consider only a single pixel at a time from each LDR exposure, Tocci et al. [31] presented an algorithm that incorporates a neighborhood of LDR samples in the reconstruction.
In the P-GSTA method, a linear function with all significant granulometric parameters that are summed with different weighting factors was used to infer sediment-transport direction (sediment flux pattern); the previous grain-size trend analysis (GSTA) methods considered only three parameters (mean grain size, sorting, and skewness) with equal weighting.
Some methods consider only one receptor conformation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com