Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(1)
Only two respondents (both who had had an unintended pregnancy after age 35) were currently using methods considered "very effective" by the World Health Organization (intrauterine contraception [IUC] and contraceptive implant)[ 18].
Similar(59)
This FMTAD derivatization method is considered very useful for determination of vitamin D analogs in ESI and applicable for biological samples.
This new method is considered very useful in the context of the preclinical development of IRDye800CW fluorescent probes for optical molecular imaging, likely contributing to the selection of lead compounds that are the most promising for clinical translation.
Taking into account the current trend, in optical imaging, of moving towards the translation of targeted fluorescent probes to clinical diagnostic use, this new method is considered very valuable for preclinical assessment of tissue distribution of IR fluorescent probes, with an accuracy that thus far was inexistent.
This would suggest that even though the visual method is not considered very scientific the results produced by the method are close to the results that would be produced by the more scientific rheological method.
MLST (targeting 7 housekeeping genes) and multi-spacer sequence analysis are considered very robust methods for identifying species within the M. abscessus complex [ 1].
The results show that the q-Gaussian model can be considered very competitive with the other classification methods.
The statistical analyses were performed with One-way ANOVA method and p<0.05 was considered significant while p<0.01 was considered very significant.
And considered very seriously.
Overall accuracy for all the methods considered here is very high, with at least 94% of reported segments reflecting true underlying IBD.
On the basis of these sectoral results and the economy-wide differences provided in Tables 2 and 3, we may conclude that, on average, the three methods considered in this paper perform very, very similarly for most practical purposes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com