Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
Results from both methods compare well with each other.
Recent publications have shown that bio/immuno methods compare well with standard GC/HRMS methods in terms of sensitivity, selectivity and accuracy [ 115– 118].Most analytical laboratories are now being challenged to analyze for multiple analyte groups, including polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), polychlorinated naphthalenes, as well as dioxins, furans and DLPCBs.
Similar(58)
Burnup values determined from both methods compared well with the values predicted from simulations.
The two methods compared well for agricultural pesticides and metals, which were not included in the earlier study.
eGFR by both methods compared well to the other continuous risk factors systolic blood pressure and BMI.
The sensitivity of our multiplex microarray based minisequencing methods compares well with the sensitivity of other single nucleotide primer extension assays performed for individual SNPs in recent studies [ 4, 25- 27].
Results from the proposed explicit method compare well with that from the implicit method.
The results from this method compare well with HTRI computer program.
The results obtained using our method compare well with the experimental data of previous researchers.
The results obtained by using this method compare well with the reference calculation.
Results from the validation process indicate that the strains obtained from the DIC method compare well with the results of strain gages.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com