Sentence examples for methods arises from from inspiring English sources

The analogy between the proposed and test-target methods arises from using known image properties.

The low recovery factor of primary and secondary methods arises from their low sweep efficiency at the macroscopic level as the viscosity of the heavy oil is far greater than the viscosity of water (i.e. viscous fingering) and the low displacement efficiency at the pores matrix due to capillary forces that trap the oil (Bartel et al. 2007).

Disagreement between the methods arises from many factors, including the type of ecological/landscape features that are assumed to contribute to the provision of aesthetic values, the use of context-specific or generic aesthetic value estimates, the scale of landscape evaluation and the level of integration of the landscape preference analysis.

In general, significance from computational methods arises from aggregate performance of groups of genes, but this is less useful in providing (potentially costly) experimental targets.

The strength of these methods arises from their ability to provide information on more proximal markers of dose and on early markers of contributions from multiple pathways to diseased states (Andersen and Krewski 2009; Krewski et al. 2009).

The need of global optimization methods arises from the non-convexity of the general problem, due to the frequent bi-linear terms for the controls, the non-linear character of the systems dynamics, and the presence of (nonlinear) constraints [ 25].

The highest differences between assessment methods arise from the default assumptions in case of missing substance data.

In the study of the asymptotic behavior of discrete-time systems, there is an increasing interest in finding methods arising from control theory (see [5 8, 21 27, 29 32]).

Then, the proposed optimization procedure has been compared with three alternative methods arising from the relevant literature on the basis of a wide benchmark of test cases.

Malingering in neuropsychological assessment has been the subject of intense research for more than a decade and the detection methods arising from this work are diverse and sophisticated.

Most differences between methods arise from their size selectivity: ATs select for larger species, while HN and BT seem least selective.