Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
All comparing methods are respectively implemented using the parameters given in relevant references aforementioned.
The results of conventional MP methods and spectral analysis methods are, respectively, shown in (a) and (b) for better readability.
Futhermore, SVD, BRD, and GI methods are respectively applied into a same fluid model, and the computing speed and inversion accuracy are compared and analyzed.
Different methods are respectively proposed to calculate the discharge of flow exchange caused by free surface gradient and turbidity current intrusion.
As with the ratio system by replacing the subjective significance coefficient with the combination of subjective significance coefficient with Shannon's entropy ( {w}_j^{ast } ), the extended reference point approach, the extended full multiplicative form and the optimal alternative rankings of proposed methods are respectively achieved by calculating Eqs.
For 1% case reporting and detection specificity of 95%, our method is 100% sensitive and has median detection time (MDT) of 4 weeks while the Mov-Avg Cusum and ILI rate threshold methods are, respectively, 97% and 100% sensitive with MDT of 5 weeks.
Similar(54)
HPLC-ELSD, LC-ESI-MS/MS and GC MS methods were respectively developed and applied to the analysis of small molecular carbohydrates in jujube extract.
Behavior of the normalized misfit and objective functional of the SD and GN methods is, respectively, rendered at the middle and bottom panels of this figure.
In the study, HPLC-ELSD, LC-ESI-MS/MS and GC MS methods were respectively developed and applied to analyzing small molecular carbohydrates in jujube extract and the performances of these methods were compared.
The five-year probabilities estimated by the Kaplan-Meier and the competing risks methods were respectively: death: 50% versus 30%; transfer to hemodialysis: 59% versus 32%; renal transplantation: 39% versus 26%; event-free survival: 12% versus 12%.
Purity and expanded uncertainty as determined by the three methods were respectively 99.81%, 0.16%; 99.79%, 0.16%; and 99.81%, 0.26% with, in all cases, a coverage factor (k) of 2 (P=95%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com