Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(38)
High-variance learning methods are prone to overfitting the training data.
However, the current top down synthesis methods are prone to contamination, which can adversely affect properties, such as optical absorption and emission, electrochemical properties, carrier mobility, biological activity and toxicological properties6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13.
Though in wide use, such methods are prone to numerical instability unless numerical diffusion or some other form of regularization is used, especially for higher-order methods.
Microbial enumeration methods, however, are known to yield highly variable counts (even among replicates) and some methods are prone to substantial losses (i.e. only a fraction of the target microorganisms in a sample are observed).
Yet, these methods are prone to exhibit spatio-temporal inconsistencies for moving foreground objects.
Unfortunately, this is not usually the case [16], and those pansharpening methods are prone to spectral distortions.
Similar(22)
However, the performance of these methods is prone to be adversely affected by the presence of outliers and noises.
Although straightforward in application, the WFE method is prone to numerical difficulties.
If no connectivity or closed objects are considered, the method is prone to produce isolated pixels.
The commonly used least squares method is prone to over-estimation, thus the Chebyshev fitting should in turn be implemented.
Because the Z-method is prone to overestimating the Tm in some systems2, in order to verify its validity, we also calculate Tm by using the two-phase method with NPT ensemble (TPM-NPT 20. TPM-NPT 20
More suggestions(15)
methods are capable
methods are vulnerable
methods are amenable
approach are prone
methods are exposed
methods are inclined
methods are notorious
methods are available
methods are primitive
methods are shoddy
methods are unconventional
methods are superior
methods are soil-free
methods are simple
methods are insane
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com