Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(19)
These methods are poorly suited for incorporating prior information into the decomposition process.
However, the validity and accuracy of such methods are poorly understood.
Standard statistical methods are available for analyzing longitudinal data, but the literature reveals that these methods are poorly understood by practitioners.
Unfortunately, many of these methods are poorly understood or not utilized by fish-health scientists and aquaculturists — often because of the lack of contact with epidemiologists who are willing to investigate fish diseases.
Available systems use gravity or pumps to deliver these fluids, but such methods are poorly suited to moment-to-moment control of the volume, timing, and type of fluid delivered.
Traditional audio visualization methods are poorly suited to real-world tasks, so we are creating new visual representations designed for a production environment.
Similar(41)
Patient characteristics, sampling methods and reference standard methods were poorly reported in most studies.
For the majority of studies, methodological quality was low and the methods were poorly described.
The process was challenging and time-consuming; largely because study methods were poorly described or unsystematic.
For those who did, details of consensus methods were poorly reported.
However, the performance of the individual methods is poorly understood and validation of algorithmic performances is still missing to a large extent.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com