Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(15)
Current IMS methods are insensitive due to the small sample sizes analysed.
However, it is generally accepted that the current methods are insensitive and often non-specific compared to those used for soft tissue disease.
Furthermore, X-ray diffraction methods are insensitive to the positions of H atoms in crystalline materials and thus their atomic positions must be inferred.
It is shown that the mode shapes obtained by the approximate methods are insensitive to the choice of the mass lumping scheme.
It is shown that both epi-fluorescence microscopy and FCM can be utilized in conjunction with the PNA probes to specifically identify M. parafortuitum among a mixed microbial community in MWF It is also shown that the M. parafortuitum labeling methods are insensitive to the synthetic, semi-synthetic, and soluble oil MWF chemistries investigated.
In terms of ROC curves and AUC measures, proposed methods are insensitive to small deviations in prior strengths (within a range of reasonable values).
Similar(45)
We may thus conclude that parameter estimates using the proposed method are insensitive to the choices of initial values.
This proves that the proposed method is insensitive to noise.
But this method is insensitive to parameter changes.
It was found that the proposed method is insensitive to parameter changes.
However, the Jaccard method is insensitive to synonymy and polysemy of words.
More suggestions(15)
approach are insensitive
procedures are insensitive
methods are indirect
methods are available
methods are notorious
methods are primitive
methods are shoddy
methods are unconventional
methods are soil-free
methods are simple
methods are insane
methods are different
methods are costly
methods are cheap
methods are unorthodox
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com