Partial discrepancies between von Neumann artificial viscosity method and Godunov method are exhibited.
The accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method are exhibited from the numerical computations.
Ion track etching method, mask etching method chemical solution etching method, and high-energy particle etching and shrinkage method are exhibited in this report.
Much lower computational time of the DQM with respect to Newmark's method is exhibited.
Under the optimum conditions, the method was exhibited a linear range of 0.1 100 μg L−1 (R2 = 0.9943) for THC with a detection limit of 0.04 μg L−1.
At optimum experimental conditions, UAMSPE-UV vis method was exhibited a linear range of 0.8–8.7 mg L−1 of the MO concentration with a detection limit of 0.18 mg L−1.
The efficiency of the proposed method is exhibited by comparing corresponding results with certain experimental data, as well as with the very few existing relevant analytical results obtained elsewhere, on the basis of an alternative mathematical method (the state space concept).
(ρ = 0.60) The mean quality scores for the three methods and the two centers are exhibited with their 95% confidence limits in Fig. 1.
Several examples are shown where the capabilities of the method on large scale structures are exhibited.
The disparity maps, which are generated by the proposed and compared methods, will be exhibited.
