The frequency of slugs, established using three different methods, was around 1.5 Hz for the evaluated conditions evaluated.
Even in those cases where the precision for some methods is around 0.27, the proposed method gives a precision of 0.61.
For migraine, the difference between the two methods was around 10% (15.4 vs 14.0%) for 1-year prevalence, but almost 30% for lifetime prevalence (22.2 vs. 15.9%).
In comparison, the size of nanofibers prepared using the conventional methods is around 40 nm which is slightly bigger than our method and do not have the weblike structure [27].
The results showed that the 25 years annual mean temperatures obtained from the three interpolation methods were around 0.64 degree Celsius higher than the official data, indicating general overestimation in the interpolated results.
Specificity values of all three methods were around 90%.
In general, the limits of detection of this method are around 10 100 times higher than the limits of detection found in the literature for wastewater samples analyzed by equivalent off-line methods.
From Fig. 2, we can see that the results of Monte Carlo method are around the results of the FDM, which indicates that the results of the FDM are accurate.
The absolute values of KDs obtained for binding to the individual ligands obtained by this method are around an order of magnitude lower (tighter binding) than those obtained for the same ligands in solution by ITC.
The answer ratio using this method was around 15%.
