Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Essentially, the authors replicated the Wall study using different methods and got different results.
Similar(58)
The final act shoves a message in our face, something about kids respecting their parents, and parents rejecting today's namby-pamby parenting methods and getting tough.
Consequently, the proposed method can avoid the pitfalls of purely single tracking methods and get reliably labeled samples to incrementally update each tracker (if it is an appearance-adaptive tracker) to capture the appearance changes.
In prospective analysis, researchers can design the data collection methods and get details of cost items (e.g., patient transportation cost, time cost), which may not be possible in retrospective analysis without any additional assumptions.
During this phase people were coming to terms with their weight, researching different weight loss methods and getting ready to change.
Given the amount of simulations and subsequent analysis required in such an extensive study, my strategy in carrying out the investigation was to focus on a few most-commonly used methods, and get an overall picture regarding their relative performance.
The authors use a multiplicity of methods, and get a range of values, which they openly report.
Considerations include defining when scientific thresholds have been met for 'proving' the effectiveness of prevention methods [ 13], obtaining the 'approval' of relevant authorities for such methods, and getting stakeholder agreement which may require overcoming possible cultural objections to these prevention methods [ 14].
We again calculated the best and using our post processing method and got the results in Figure 10.
The bglB- and ZMO1086-gene-amplified ZMO1086-gene-amplified ZMO1086-gene-amplified promoter Peno by the same method and got the plasmid pbglB and pZM1086 (fragment
Then, the bglB fragment was inserted and located at the downstream of the promoter Peno and signal peptide by the same method and got the plasmid pSP1086-bglB (Fig. 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com