Sentence examples for methods and concordance from inspiring English sources

The MADM problems are classified as scoring methods, compromising methods and concordance methods.

An overall concordance of Ion Proton (409-gene panel) sequencing with orthogonal methods and concordance with the MiSeq (54-gene panel) sequencer established the accuracy and robustness of the Ion Proton (409-gene panel).

A dialogue over data sets, analysis methods, and concordance measures has evolved, but no clear consensus on the level of agreement or disagreement in expression results has been reached.

These methods can be described under three categories: (1) scoring methods (2) compromising methods and (3) concordance methods (Hwang and Yoon 1981).

The gradient-based methodology was less sensitive to reconstruction variability than the 40% isocontour method; Dice coefficients and concordance indices were superior to 0.8 for both PSF reconstruction methods.

The assays were evaluated with various rotavirus isolates and 89 clinical samples from Virginia, Bangladesh and Tanzania, and exhibited 95% (81/85) sensitivity compared with the conventional RT-PCR-Gel-electrophoresis method, and 100% concordance with sequencing.

The isolates grouped differently with each method and the concordance of strain groupings based on typing method was low, with 65%and10%0% of isolates with identical AFLP type having different Rep-PCR types and ERIC types respectively.

We calculated the prevalence of HPV categories by collection method, and the concordance between specimens, as shown in Table 2; prevalence adjusted for age group and the population group (screened vs. under-screened) was not appreciably different (data not shown).

To address this issue, we preprocessed a lung cancer dataset (Stearman et al., 2005) using five different methods and compared the concordance among the five lists of inferred DV genes.

Following the introduction of a relevant borderline interval (see material and methods) concordance was improved substantially (0.86, 0.93 and 0.99, respectively).

Rather than treating either source as the gold standard, the authors examined the relative concordance between these two methods and patient predictors affecting concordance levels.